About
Most clean-energy projects don't die because the technology fails. They stall — or get killed late — because a feasibility fact that was knowable on day one didn't surface until day ninety.
The teams most exposed to that risk are the ones with the least slack: small C&I solar and storage developers, independent and community-solar shops, energy consultants and brokers, and small EV-charging developers. They can't justify a $2,000–3,000/year enterprise design seat to screen a pipeline of maybe-sites — so they fall back on spreadsheets and stale rate lookups, and they get surprised.
Screening is its own job. It's not engineering and it's not a sales demo. The right first-look tool tells you which sites deserve real studies — quickly, cheaply, and without a login.
Trust comes from showing your work. Every number SiteLitmus produces is confidence-scored and stamped with the date its source was last verified, with the method one click away. We'd rather flag uncertainty than fake precision. That honesty is the whole point of a derisking tool — and it's why the name is a litmus test.
Unbundle it. You should be able to buy just the check you need — cost of power, incentives, interconnection, permitting, site & land risk — instead of a bundled suite priced for a different customer.
SiteLitmus started with the hardest number to get right — the true, all-in cost of power at a specific meter — and is growing into a full derisking suite: revenue and offtake, grid hosting capacity, permitting and entitlements, and constructability, each as a standalone module that shares one address-level engine.